I assume nothing about your character. You made it very clear what type of person you are in the above posts where you very plainly state that you are prepared to defend corruption and unfairness.


It's impossible to prove that. Only Theymos knows exactly why he banned Goat. If you read my posts carefully you will see that at no point have I asserted that he was definitely banned solely because he criticized Theymos. All I have done is point out a worrying series of coincidences.

Here are the facts:

Goat is an idiot. He has trolled, acted belligerently, lost a lot of investor coins, etc, for the whole time he has been a member.

He was only banned when he criticized Theymos, and not before.

His behavior was suddenly deemed to be intolerable as soon as he began to take issue with the personal dealings of Theymos.

He isn't the only person to suddenly have longstanding behavior deemed intolerable as soon as they criticized the personal dealings of Theymos.

These facts don't prove anything. But they do give me cause for suspicion.

If you want to ignore these facts completely and put all of your faith in Theymos telling the truth about his reasons then it is up to you. Maybe I'm a cynical bastard, but I usually decide what to believe for myself rather than trusting people blindly. If you need irrevocable evidence of a lie before you are prepared to question people's version of the truth, well I suppose you are just a much more naturally trusting person than I am.

To be honest I am not sure why you are still trying to debate me on this issue. You have already said that if Theymos did decide to ban Goat because he criticized his private business dealings then it would be OK with you, so why are you asking me to provide proof? Even if it were possible to prove it, such proof would be greeted with indifference by you.

In an unrelated matter, your understanding of Aristotle on logic seems to be a little flawed. I am glad I got my degree in Philosophy from Oxford rather than wherever you studied it.