Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 04, 2015, 08:19:25 AM

Quote from: DecentralizeEconomics on December 04, 2015, 12:39:28 AM

It's a logical conclusion. If Jinn assets are "*NOT* an investment" and after a certain date they aren't redeemable IOTA which the CEO claims is "NOT a cryptocurrency", what are they?

Your logical conclusion is wrong.

The misunderstanding regarding status of JINN arises because the lawyer recommended not to extend on JINN definition beyond one set during that dutch auction. It's part of our legal defense - to avoid answering the question just because some person who purchased JINN from the original purchasers may attempt to catch us at our word to get more rights than was planned.

So, the conditions haven't changed, if you need more info the only viable way to get it is to contact us privately (be ready to provide proof of JINN ownership).

PS: I hope you'll get the issue and will stop spreading the misinformation.

So, will investors who hold Jinn assets after the IOTA redemption period is over be legally transferred profit-shares?