Quote from: Carlton Banks on December 04, 2015, 10:47:59 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on December 04, 2015, 10:11:13 AM

Quote from: hdbuck on December 04, 2015, 10:04:31 AM

Quote from: Zarathustra on December 04, 2015, 10:03:49 AM

Quote from: gmaxwell on December 03, 2015, 08:25:32 PM

Agreed. One of the most regrettable things about this block-size snafu in my view is this characterization of 800% or 2000% increases as "modest" or a _doubling_ as being too small to consider.

It is very modest, compared to a completely removed cap, which has been set as a temporary anti-spam measure.

come back whenever the spam stops.

We'll be back. 2016 is the year of at least the remove of your beloved 1MB cap. Forget the fee market that blockstream core wants to enforce with this cap. It won't happen, because it won't be accepted by the market.

Whom are you talking with?

We'll be back. 2016 is the year of at least the remove of your beloved 1MB cap. Forget the fee market that blockstream core wants to enforce with this cap. It won't happen, because it won't be accepted by the market.

Best regards to all of you censorship cheerleaders.