Quote from: brg444 on December 08, 2015, 03:50:57 AM

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 08, 2015, 03:25:59 AM

To be sure, Blockstreamers only now are coming to realize that an increase of the effective block size limit to 4 MB will have the unexpected and unwelcome consequence of increasing the effective block size limit to 4 MB.

Jesus christ at least get your FUD right.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 08, 2015, 03:25:59 AM

So Luke has already proposed to keep the 1 MB limit for the total block size, including the segregated part.

Provide quotes or GTFO.

Quote from: JorgeStolfi on December 08, 2015, 03:25:59 AM

But they should not worry, since the space savings will only occur if the clients start issuing transactions in the new SW format. Which will not happen right away, if SW is deployed by soft fork. And even after the clients have upgraded, the use of SW will be optional. Will there be incentives for the clients to use it?

No, regular transactions get a 75% bump in space.

That's the whole point of "academically neutral" FUD spreading.... obscurity... and still surprising to see, from time to time that some posters give the dufuss some credit.... hahahahaha paid shill or not, there can be a bit of humor in seeing some of the stupid-ass theories he comes up with in his attempts to describe a world that doesn't really exist.