Quote from: 1anonymous on December 10, 2015, 11:58:24 AM

You forgot the bit about how he clutched his silver metal encased USB the last few years of his life and now his brother has the key to 400M if he was one of the co-authors of the paper.

haha

It appears DK's talent in computers was mostly in the area of HDD fragmentation analysis and how hard it really is to 'erase' anything digitally.

What did Norton Erase used to do, like write 00000 over and over on a file thousands of times to make sure it couldn't be read again.

Nothing in DK's career or limited academic 'career' if his academics can even be called a 'career' show any connection to encryption and other ideas expressed in the original white paper.

DK didn't write it, the fake Satoshi aka Craig Wright didn't write it, neither had even one paper out on encryption and high level math theory.

DK analyzed HDD to try to put back together smashed drives and Wright was nothing but a guy installing canned network software that was good at updating patches.

There's nothing 'interesting' about either DK or CW as to their life.

Neither came up with anything original in their life.

Neither started a major company.

Neither authored a paper or a book worth reading.

The only interesting thing is how gullible the media is to believe Wright could have been Satoshi.

HAHA

And yet, in 2014, Kleiman's father makes this comment under a Techcrunch bitcoin article:

Quote

Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin

http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/10/bitcoin-wins-best-technology-achievement-but-satoshi-doesnt-show/

Nothing interesting you say?