Quote from: keepdoing on December 09, 2015, 02:58:52 PM

Craig = Satoshi. You can't fake most of the facts, and most of those facts fit. AND the amount of innacurate information, exageration and FUD being propogated is growing so exponentially it is ridiculous. This is all just conspiracy theory nonsense and drama because "Satoshi" was more fun to believe in as a purely idealistic vision - than to look at through the lens of reality.

Sort of like the whole Jesus concept. If Jesus really were to come back, today, the first thing religion would do is beat the crap out of him and nail him up to another cross all the while screaming hysterically that he was an fraud.

LOL - same thing going on here.... Seems tech weenies are still just a step evolved above the apes, even with all your loft idealistic talk. Your "Tech Jesus" has returned, and you scream to crucify him

Flippin monkeys. Just when you think there is actual evolution occurring. ROFL

LOL LOL - Oh the Hysteria

I think you're Craig wright Grin

Stop defending the lying piece of shit, we all know he's lying. Sure, he has some compelling evidence, but deeper research into that evidence shows that it's fake.

You... Calling us tech weenies? Nice work, Jr member

Quote from: Gleb Gamow on December 10, 2015, 09:31:25 PM

Quote from: Syke on December 10, 2015, 05:36:14 PM

Quote from: Preclus on December 10, 2015, 08:20:41 AM

There is nothing proving any key was backdated. Starting in 2005/2006, it became clear that SHA1 was weak and that alternatives should be used.

So Satoshi knew SHA1 was weak, so he generated 2 keys. He used the weak key publicly, and didn't use the strong key. How does that make any sense to you?

Both keys were stored in a lockbox locked via a skeleton key hidden under a rock near Satoshi's front door of his home.

Wait... What?