Quote from: keepdoing on December 11, 2015, 05:22:07 AM

Quote from: suryc on December 11, 2015, 05:12:34 AM

One of the old theories out there was that satoshi was a group of people and not just one person. I think it's much more compelling argument that Wright may just be one member of that group. But, why claim that you are satoshi after all this time is lost on me.

You've got to realize that Craig's "admissions" are old leaked data. NOT statement HE is making now. He's not claimed to be Satoshi in any public fashion that was intentional.

what if i told you Mr Wright leaked the documents himself, intentionally to get some fame hinting that he is a currency freedom god, to sway peoples mindset to not think of him as a greedy egotistical conman scamming millions from government.
ofcourse if he just came out and shouted he was a currency freedom god. he would get laughed at.. but by subtly creating so called proof. people would potentially believe him later, if they fell for the proof first.

its like governments dont just say lets bomb syria.. first they need to fake/create a reason and proof that its a real reason. such as trying to sway media to say the brussels born and raised nutters were actually linked to syria.. emphasizing syria and trying to sweep brussels under the rug for a few weeks.

Mr wright has been too public with a few things. such as back dated blogpostings and twitter comments.. but because it wasnt picked up fast enough, he needed to nudge his agenda a bit quicker, by leaking his ''proof" because time was running out before he could be arrested as a scammer, cheat and fraudster.

he really hoped that the bitcoin community would support and defend him for his tax dodging skulduggery, im guessing he was hoping for donations to cover his defense. much like (an innocent man)dorian got.

he just hinted too much, trying to act cagey about his bitcoin knowledge and involvement. it was too obvious..
EG if someone done a crime they would not act cagey hinting they may have been at the location at the time.. they would not backdate blogposts to say that they were there at the time.. they would not tell friends and family that they did the crime.

but Wright seems like a con act, trying to take responsibility for it. making evidance appear. but without revealing any real fingerprints to link him..

all in all, it just didnt sit right with me. and i hope australia, a commonwealth of the UK talks with UK police to get him to answer for his tax dodging and scammy practices