Quote from: EcuaMobi on December 13, 2015, 03:15:19 PM

Quote from: siameze on December 13, 2015, 03:09:37 PM

There is always a loser on ponzi and "doubling" sites. While it is permitted to advertise such sites here on the forum, why is it surprising that people that care about integrity give you negative feedback?

If a site promotes itself as ponzi and lets users know there's a big risk then I wouldn't say it's an obvious scam. It's doubtful and it's arguably untrustworthy but not an obvious scam. Promoting itself as "100% guaranteed" is definitely a scam.

Quote

@EcuaMobi: Yes I kept wearing the signature after it turned out they skipped nonces. The full story is that they also repaid those affected by skipped nonces. Firstly only those that lost, but later everyone else. The story was that they hired a 3rd person that patched in the skipped nonces, did a mistakes as they did not review the code before it went live. I can look up the relevant threads later if you want.

So you promoted it only when (at least you thought) it was just an error they were making and not and obvious scam? Yes I'd appreciate having the relevant threads please, it will save me some time.

Quote from: node.jps on December 13, 2015, 03:14:14 PM

Quote from: EcuaMobi on December 13, 2015, 03:01:39 PM

Quote from: node.jps on December 13, 2015, 02:55:46 PM

this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=774120.0

TBH I don't know about that case. But a dice site is not an obvious scam until proved otherwise. Did he promote it even after it was an obvious a proven scam? I see he updated a previous positive trust to neutral after the scam was found.

On the other hand anything that "guarantees" always doubling your coins is an obvious scam.

To make it short: promoting a known/obvious scam deserves negative trust. Therefore I'm adding negative trust to you now. If you can prove without any doubts shorena was promoting that dice site after the scam was proved above reasonable doubt then I'll add negative trust to him too. Sounds fair?

further evidence here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=778953.0;all
his name was listed which proves he was still participating

I know he was participating. What I don't know yet is if at that time it was an obvious scam or not.

It was an obvious scam, the thread listed was only for those left in the campaign after it was discovered to be a scam

Quote from: dooglus on September 11, 2014, 05:43:07 PM

tldr: no more signups will be accepted - this thread is only for me to pay out the escrowed coins I have for this month's campaign

This thread continues from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=776227

The story so far:

dicebitco.in escrowed 5 BTC with bitcoininformation and 5 BTC with me to cover their signature campaign for September.

About a week in to September their site was found to be cheating some players, and everything blew up.

Many suspect them of being scammers, they claim the cheat was put in place by a rogue employee.

They asked bitcoininformation and I to pay out this month's campaign.

Yesterday bitcoininformation paid out all coins due for the first 10 days of the campaign, using up most of the 5 BTC he was holding. He sent me the rest, and I will use that to pay out remaining coins owed at the end of the month.

Here's a list of everyone who is still participating in the campaign. If you're not in the list but think you should be, please let me know. Also, if you rank up, let me know that too.

Username	Posts at start	Posts at 1st payment	Rank	Bitcoin Address
-----------------	-------------------	----------------------------	------------	-------------------
Mr.Bitty	124	156	Full	1GNY8KMoYSf1XD5PdnJhT3XsH1vtwNiv1G
dankkk	123	191	Full	189ZeVvKf9rd9mEgJxUwLU7FcEjqsxDA64
onlinepro	1012	1038	Full	1QB4LSqVVr2SnYmAaQBfdzCZKrgTTuAWA3
zorke	283	288	Full	1DbFjzSZtQ1yUphyXa6zkLnxNoNkhMwiGi
Gianluca95	1030	1061	Full	13fF2Hsqbq6k5ouRMzoodvC5vRCMDf6dXV
cookiemonsterwhat	457	561	Full	1CtoaU2QcGos2396NA5zvLxJAnBF4GNEaR
deisik	6293	6359	Senior	1NBY6GbirSZuW7CaWQSgB6AwtHW2Fe1uqc
shorena	1805	1932	Senior	1nwD3Zs5EdxBmu3TBxj4Ti5TpTGAEDJ2f
umair127	1260	1299	Senior	19FLPc1RvfbBAmWfSQ3s4ZjQXr7uH6ScLf
sana8410	1849	1903	Senior	15Bkkqp6CQzonuDkArzkmuMVd34DWfx8bK
noviapriani	1207	1245	Senior	1DdLNtqfpMCyUTj4A1yQsxpuPdfjVf6brq
wasserman99	733	808	Senior	12sCophG49cXCr1xrCUHoRUB7gRs7HLpBH
lucolo	1247	1388	Senior	1BHidJUxZPr5ZWq5vLdxZf8bdBCZrpeaHd
Swordsoffreedom	2673	2682	Senior	1K1WUEbAhsR3D9GAeW5G3ALSVMkYLr68ve
Rigon	1256	1300	Senior	1EnaKAbDuDDXUzr365Hx8xT3Rbkkkn3hAK
leannemckim46	274	341	Senior	1EWuSykkvypnyCmdBQ36p1USY4rtSpSWg4
LastRoby	475	599	Senior	13GPLr3QwaCSA3x7uv9PfaeGQVby4riZR2
kuroman	1871	1877	Senior	13TQEgpS1ENz76HGTwSFh8Xv6oqdvqdrRV
Echoes	2428	2488	Hero	1Mcpe26uh5yMPr8DH917XWrEjQRSEXLcyA
WhiteShum	2340	2379	Hero	1FAjmDqYXEBiHBXZNE6aRoFrzTG37qyiXd
InwardContour	985	1048	Senior	1GEuSxAEMrGo1xA6LtpJ218YuX3G6ZHure
fox19891989	1601	1648	Senior	1CSq4j189tE6j5fHg3Br9AUuo5PgJ7V9oj
bittaitaliana	1357	1394	Senior	1PNAZe5nLgnHpiXALV7Ev4FuGUUEs5UGGM
thecoinjournal	2913	2973	Senior	1FBYbiTeoPfS9Z9sT6XtiCKNAH4JwoiGBH
naphto	1715	1714	Senior	1NLXkBBHdv36RwTMEUwUfXMtqVWCADiq48
asdlolciterquit	1313	1411	Senior	19pUh8un8rtPZoLYXpp9cQbn99Ay5u7NE
szmarco	596	615	Senior	1978915zZ8PQAoHQdxJbJ9oeHyzUGeXvBW
ChuckBuck	1953	2001	Senior	1CwmksPZUfZbEh7efyzpueF8rBnHm99DFa
johncarpe64	272	331	Senior	1CEmkomAxZhHr7z2d8vndYUm4nAkrdTG55

Removed:

Username	Posts at start	Posts at 1st payment	Rank	Reason
-----------------	-------------------	----------------------------	------------	-------------------
hdbuck	1991	2071	Senior	advertising for multiple campaigns at once (ASICMINER)
dKingston	290	311	Senior	switched to cryptcominer
DebitMe	1136	1384	Hero	switched to fortunejack
DooMAD	477	493	Senior	switched to bitmixer
beetcoin	4499	4623	Senior	blank signature
pedrosoft	485	509	Senior	blank signature
leancuisine	1206	1215	Senior	blank signature
itsaj	470	560	Senior	switched to gawminers
master-P	627	694	Senior	blank signature
Vagnavs	587	597	Hero	switched to bitmixer

as you can see, he didnt leave the campaign he stayed