Quote from: webchris on December 13, 2015, 04:06:55 PM

Quote from: Bitcoiner2015 on December 13, 2015, 08:32:15 AM

If you had undug addresses you wouldn't be suggesting we postpone or cancel digging, don't screw over other people just because you got yours.

I don't think that's fair. Leaving the distribution out there forever screws all current and future owners of CLAM, not to mention potential buyers/adopters who were not part of the distro. or are turned off because of the distro. risks. Changing it would potentially screw some unknown people in the future who may have undug clams who happened to have balances in BTC/LTC/Doge addresses on the date of the distribution and have not yet heard of CLAM thru the scouring of all the crypto communities hunting for undug clams. The logic of "it hurts someone" can be in both arguments, for or against. But to me, the argument seems like "lets screw everybody who owns clams and who might have bought clams because there could be a few people out there who might dig up some clams that aren't whale diggers who ran a website/service/script that left them with a cache of funded addresses".

At some point, the coin's market cap becomes large enough to absorb the (theoretical) big digs without much damage. It could be rough in the early days, but if the fundamentals are good, things will be fine long term.