Quote from: bensam1231 on December 15, 2015, 10:02:37 AM

Quote from: djm34 on December 14, 2015, 09:11:06 PM

Quote from: sp_ on December 14, 2015, 03:38:49 PM

Quote from: theotherme on December 14, 2015, 02:45:16 PM

Quote from: sp_ on December 14, 2015, 02:41:48 PM

Quote from: theotherme on December 14, 2015, 02:39:30 PM

considering, I never worked on quark, your comparison is irrelevant as usual

Your Lyra2v2 kernal is slow on the gtx 950 and the gtx 960. I have improved it. It is faster on all the maxwell models. My modded kernals are 100-200KHASH bether on the 750tis'
Around 5%.
It's enough to prove that my work is faster.

you just tweaked kernel parameters (which were adjustable by the user in my version btw), so no there is no real difference...
(except the huge overclock on your cards)

No. I have done more. My kernel compiles down to 110 registers and no spillbytes. Yours is 213 regs. Do a filecompare and check for yourself.

doesn't make any difference, you should know it... as long as there is enough registers (and it is clearly not 213 reg either... but hey I am happy to keep your thread on top of the mining forum... so you can get donation... for a last time)

Typical troll. Disprove a argument > switch the topic. Do it over and over again till the person you're arguing with gives up.

I like how you talk about broken software and yours is, then you say 'it doesn't matter cause a earlier release wasn't broken'. Same thing could be said about SPs software when things break. But oh it's different because it's a different version of cuda? That's like having software that only works on XP when everyone is using W7 or W10, then stating it works on XP so everyone should stay on it. GG hypocrite

"Typical troll. Disprove a argument > switch the topic. Do it over and over again till the person you're arguing with gives up."
yep and you are an expert on that matter, as your little text prove it... Grin