Quote from: joblo on December 20, 2015, 07:13:43 PM

Quote from: chrysophylax on December 20, 2015, 03:33:46 AM

Quote from: pallas on December 20, 2015, 03:13:54 AM

Quote from: Eliovp on December 19, 2015, 05:52:51 PM

Quote from: tbearhere on December 19, 2015, 04:49:17 PM

Quote from: sp_ on December 19, 2015, 12:11:43 AM

Good cards. But they draw 200-250w. The x11 kernal is not optimal. You should mine something else.

4 750ti's draw 260 watts.

4 R9 Nano's draw 400 watt while doing 11Mhz per card!.. Wink

Is that at the wall? My fury draws more than 300 watt, the single card! And it's the same chipset.

yup ...

apparently the nano has mixed specs of the fury x and fury - but with a much lower power draw - and a much smaller size mate ...

very impressive cards ... but very expensive cards

...

#crysx

980 performance in a half length card with only one 8 pin power connector, it's only a matter of time for someone
to build a 2x-nano.

Unlikley as Nanos are cherry picked FuryX's... When chips are binned you only get so many that operate at lower voltages and that's why the price is so high.

Quote from: serg_25 on December 21, 2015, 07:50:29 AM

Hi Guys. did you see that speed?

https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=news&id=53

damn... amd again can be more profitable than nvidia.
Look at X11 speed. 11.72mh with r9 280x.

P.S. wolf, is it your work on nicehash?

This is also unlikely to change anything. People that are mining on X11 currently all have private kernels and people that don't, don't mine it... So I suspect relatively little will change.

Although dangerous that R9-280xs from years ago are back in the running. Somedays I wish I still had my AMD rigs, then other days I realize I sold them because they gobbled too much power and there was nothing to mine with them when I sold them.