Quote from: Coinoisseur on November 14, 2012, 11:30:00 PM

I definitely think this particular scammer request is a lot more grey than the Kraken Fund one. Might as well give all the PPT operators scammer tags, even those that were very clear they take no responsibility from the get go. Their defaults are just as opaque as Patrick's. Given there is currently not a "Debtor" or "In Default" tag it probably is for the best to slap a scarlet scammer on it all.

No, because they claimed no responsibility and they were clear they would strictly deposit money for them with Pirate and charge them a part of the % given by pirate for the "service of depositing". They fully delivered on all their claims. All those operators claims were found to be true and delivered upon, which makes the arrangement valid.

Patrick on the other hand claimed to offer instant withdrawal and x% interest on deposits. He did not deliver not because he can't but because he is unwilling to pay the debt he incurred in full from his own pocket. Which makes it not a default but a scam. He neither delivers all his claim as per agreement nor refunds the funds he received for the agreement.