Quote from: errorcoin22 on December 30, 2015, 01:09:10 AM

Quote from: lemipawa on December 30, 2015, 01:04:29 AM

Quote from: errorcoin22 on December 30, 2015, 12:52:51 AM

Quote from: lemipawa on December 30, 2015, 12:45:37 AM

yahoo62278 is just doing his part at least pay those who participated in the campaign which is a good gesture rather than sit back and wait for payments coming from escrow. I don't see a reason why campaign managers will be held liable for the loss since they are just managing the campaign and funds are not held by them. No campaign manager would like this to happen so lets not put pressure on the campaign managers please.

It's not his place to decide if the participants get paid. No more than it's my place to decide if they get paid.
It's not his place to insult the ~~spammers~~ participants for wanting the 'measly $5" that's owed them.
According to him, he's just a post-counting peon, never touches the money. Why the begging thread then?

@Quickseller: I'm not surprised. My creditors expect me to pay them, regardless of my getting robbed. I, in turn, expect the same from my debtors.

And where do you expect the funds will come from? From Master-P? He's gone or something to that nature.
What's wrong with the begging thread? yahoo62278 is going beyond of what is being expected from him so what is wrong with that?

The money would come from the ~~scumbags~~ reputable establishments yahoo62278 represents, where it always (allegedly)comes from, where else?

>What's wrong with the begging thread?
Begging is not allowed on bitcointalk. It's one of the few stated rules here.

I don't see this as begging, and your complaints about this are probably going to fall on deaf ears given what happened. He's soliciting donations to try to right a wrong that was done to this community. If you can't be at least that flexible, I feel sorry for you. But as far as who should own the liability, it's whoever is paying the sig spammers. I agree with you on that.