Quote from: vhaasteren on December 31, 2015, 08:59:03 PM

Quote from: Hyena on December 31, 2015, 05:41:46 PM

When I saw this video, it was clear to me that what we are taught in the geography is utter bullshit and should not be taken seriously. It is a known historical fact that no one has ever drilled deeper than 12 km. Thus, how on Earth can a scientist say what is inside Earth. Just because some places put out lava does not mean the whole Earth is filled by it. Those shit scientist really think people are that stupid that they believe just any ridiculous explanation they serve via the public education system.

Hyena, I'll be polite this time, but please listen to me. This is exactly the reason why people like me would get irritated by you.

There is a very simple physical reason why that is happening in that video. There is also a very simple reason why it does not happen in planet formation (hint: the ratio of centrifugal force and self-gravitating force is different). The problem is that you don't understand that, and immediately conclude that all of physics is wrong. Why don't you instead ask someone who understands physics to explain why we do not think the Earth is hollow? Then people like me are much more inclined to reasonable conversation... with your attitude, however, you cannot expect people to take you seriously.

Thanks for being polite, it's always appreciated. However, you have failed to understand the principles of mathematical induction. Ever heard of the fractal nature of the universe? Did it ever occur to you that our universe is self-similar? Events on the small scale resemble events on the large scale and so on. Look it up. I have never concluded that all physics is wrong. However, there are certain problems with the physics they teach us in schools and even in universities. Just to get the ball rolling for you, check out Tesla's suppressed technologies and scalar waves. I'm not going to even start babbling about ether.

That said, your main argument seems to be that the ratio of centrifugal force and self-gravitating force is being different. With that you have just exposed your own ignorance because you fail to see that in the infinite universe where the an alleged big bang started it all in a chaotic manner, all sorts of planet formation conditions are possible. I never said that all planets are hollow as a rule. Instead, I said that planets could potentially form as hollow objects. It all depends on the properties of the initial spinning cloud of dust and gas that later becomes a planet. If the rotation speed is high enough it will defeat the gravitational pull the same way Saturn gets to keep its rings. If the angular acceleration due to rotation is slightly less than the gravitational pull to the centre then the planet will end up as a filled object. On the other hand, when the angular acceleration due to rotation is slightly more than the gravitational pull the planet will eventually fall apart.