Quote from: craptsy_sucks on January 01, 2016, 02:11:09 AM

Quote from: Hippie Tech on January 01, 2016, 01:30:12 AM

Quote from: Horus_Cryptsy on December 31, 2015, 07:21:47 PM

You guys are going tinfoil hat again. Admins had a small amount of BTC and some Points float to resolve any customer issues that arise. All I had to do was send that guy some coins to fix the error we had. I probably sent it via trade key even. I thought I was fair to him and it was good compensation. I don'e see it, but if there was a source code question, odds are someone updated me with a message saying there was a fork or update on a wallet and I asked for the code so I could send it to one of our wallet guys and save some time.

When someone says...

Quote from: Horus_Cryptsy on November 23, 2015, 05:15:52 AM

Hello,

Do you by chance have link to the source code of the newest wallet? I can check against ours and see what's up.

.. it can only mean one thing ! YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE FUCKING CODE !

WTF !! You're a coder/dev too ? Huh

Did you go to the same mudderFUDdin dev/coder school as Crustynton and meee ?? LMAO

Happy Newb Year dumbass ! Tongue

Quote from: Horus_Cryptsy on January 01, 2016, 01:59:15 AM

Actually, It does not mean I have access to the wallet code. Our wallet status page ( with no accessible code) lists the version number and block of the wallet we are on. This allows customer service agents to see if they need to report a chain that is off or something when comparing to current block on explorer. You are twisting words to make what you want, but you are dead wrong. In this case, I assume someone asked if we were on the current version. I asked for source of coin to see if it was wallet version we were on. Simple as that. Sorry, no conspiracy for you today Sad

Sorry to disappoint.

I am 100% on Horus's side here on this particular point -- It is more plausible than not that customer service agents (and horus) would have access to basic info like wallet version. Even the public can see a simplified version of what Horus describes here: https://www.cryptsy.com/pages/status

It would be absolutely trivial to add wallet version to it. Sorry Hippie Tech, nothing to see here, but I'm sure there is elsewhere. My current leading theory is that BigVern is under a gag order by US. Govt. because of their involvement with GAW (and possibly other issues, such as many occasions where accounts had negative balances b/c of Cryptsy's flawed trade engine), and is unable to allow withdrawals as the feds have seized the cold wallets to perform an audit. This could explain why deposits still work and rarely someone reports a very small withdrawal working after huge delays, and why BigVern might not be allowed to tell others what the real issue is. Many times, these kinds of gag orders and investigations are performed in secret, so only those who absolutely must know about it are informed and everyone else is left in the dark. Increased KYC scrutiny is also explained by this as cryptsy would want to get their shit together ASAP if they know the government is looking at them, so they would force people to upgrade their verification level.

I respect your insight about Horus.

Interesting, if the other is true and they (whoever they are) allow Cryptsy to continue operating.