Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud)
by
VeritasSapere
on 01/01/2016, 15:02:13 UTC
Quote from: Lauda on January 01, 2016, 10:06:52 AM
Quote from: jbreher on December 31, 2015, 08:14:19 PM
Of course, if he has issued a further statement, I'd be happy to read it.

Incidentally: appeal to authority?
Your post is wrong. People in this discussion have become very deluded throwing fallacies around like they're candy. Naming the source of something means that I'm appealing to authority?  Roll Eyes

Quote from: jbreher on December 31, 2015, 08:14:19 PM
I see that you are trying to build in the mind the reader the impression that Gavin has declared that the BU codebase has resulted in a faulty executable program. Unless Gavin has issued further input to the BU review, you are mischaracterizing his statement. Nothing i have read in his comments would support that position.
You can easily see what Gavin wrote a few posts back in this thread.
You are falsely smearing Bitcoin Unlimited. The statement you where referring to was talking about the formatting and lazy blocking. Pretty standard for a code review. The lead developer of Bitcoin Unlimited even responded to Gavin in the same thread explaining the reasoning behind this formatting, this had nothing to with there being a faulty executable.