Marketing type thoughts:
You don't have enough scale to drive a crypto currency.
One of the main properties of money is it be widely accepted so it is fungible for many types of products and services. Without that feature, it is not desirable to hold it, other than as a pump & dump speculation which is why you see most altcoins declining after an initial hump of pumping (often insiders buying from themselves to pump up the value causing fools to buy).
Your best bet is to find an altcoin that will reward your signups and usership some how feeding value back to you for that effort. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be any altcoin design to do that yet. This was one of the aspects of my marketing plan for my planned altcoin (which was temporarily stalled because of some
rethinking I am going through about the idealism of crypto currency).
I think it would be best if you don't have to do anything other than some simple integration by your offshore programmer. And it would be best that you find a way to profit on a greater movement for an altcoin than to try to invent an altcoin and scale it yourself. You don't even have the slightest clue how much is required. You could not afford to do it correct, other than to clone an existing altcoin but that wouldn't be 1/100 of the work needed to accomplish a movement that will lead to a successful altcoin.
I think you should be talking to me if I decide to proceed on my altcoin and if I feel confident I can still do it. I am doing a lot of deep thinking right now.
I've had a lot of success in the past in developing and marketing to millions of users. The key is integrating into some existing need. For example, when I created CoolPage(.com) web page editor software in 1998, it incorporated 1-click instant publishing to free hosting sites Geocities, FortuneCity, etc.. This was before we had Friendster (the first FoF social network). That drove a million downloads (back when the internet was 1/10 the population) and 335,000 confirmed websites (altavista had a feature for counting these back then).
So you need to think this way of partnering with greater economies-of-scale than you can do by yourself. Otherwise you will surely fail.
Edit: this was assuming your goal is not just another pump and dump to speculators. I was assuming you want to earn money some how by monetizing your app, not by finding greater fool investors.
As far as #1 is concerned. We don't need another altcoin. New coins are met with disdain and distrust these days.
You may be better served partnering with an established altcoin. One that has talented developers and tech and, more importantly, credibility already existing. Good luck.
I don't want to be an innovator. I just need an out-of-the-box solution ideally. The value of our coin wouldn't be based on being some sort of unique coin, it would be based on its integration with our app.
If the app is a disaster, the coin is a disaster.
Invert that, since the coin will be a disaster than so will be the app.
If your financial incentive to continue developing, marketing, and improving your app rely on the success of you creating a copycoin, then your plan is already dead-on-arrival (DOA).
The copycoin era is dying (or at least until another massive run up in speculative fever for Bitcoin reignites if it does and who knows when that will be, probably not until fall 2016 at the earliest).
You don't have enough scale to drive a crypto currency.
That is true at the moment because the app has not been released or promoted yet, so we have 0 scale. However, in the event that the app takes off, I think our concept could be a great way to introduce people to the world of cryptocurrency.
Yes but you are not going to create enough diversity of uses and acceptability of your coin to scale up. Bitcoin had all the media in the world and also all the tech people wetting their pants and begging retailers to accept Bitcoin. And there was a massive speculative fever in Bitcoin in 2013.
You need to be partnered with many others who are doing similar and diverse kinds of apps and services with crypto currency. Thus you need to partner with a crypto currency which is capable of driving such a diverse interoption. This will also make the cryptocurrency aspect more enticing for your users.
Unfortunately I don't know of any serious altcoin (that has serious innovation that can challenge Bitcoin) which has some sort of partnership program like this. Perhaps Bitshares. I think I read something about an affiliation program, but I will warn you that I think Bitshares is a flawed technological direction. Afaik, NXT doesn't have anything that can help you.
Currency or other units of value can be used to purchase things as you say. But they can also be held as an investment, particularly if you have reason to believe they could increase in value (as might be the case where coins are indirectly linked to rapid stock appreciation foristance).
Without driving the currency adoption, you are just repeating the gimicks of other copycoins. Perhaps if you can get 100,000 verified users, you can gain a speculative frenzy and cash out and run. But it is very, very unlikely you can drive this to widespread adoption because it will require being able to code all the aspects of a crypto currency to make opportunities available to others who want to do what you are doing. You can't just make your own little world of copycoin and expect to achieve any ongoing network effects.
Also creating an altcoin that has something significant enough to compete with Bitcoin is a very significant effort. I'd say 100 times more work than creating an app. And a lot of specialized knowledge that for example an expert developer such as myself took 3 years to assimilate.
If we are sucessful in aquiring the millions of downloads we envision, and we incorporate the coin into our app in a compelling way, I think community interest with spring out of that, particulary if the value of the coin is linked to the success of the app.
Thank you for responding:)
If you start with the word "millions", then I think you don't have any plan B and are not doing due diligence marketing. You should instead have a plan to monetize your app even if you only get 100-1000 users per month. So that you don't put yourself in such a "do" or "die" proposition.
Another thing is that you should focus on the value your app provides to users. The crypto currency can be a way users can vote (they pay microtransactions). This adds value to your app.
But much better you could tie your scaling to 100 other developers who are also tying their scaling to yours. You should not create your own private copycoin, if you are really serious about this.
If you are just deluded or doing a pump & dump, then let me not waste any more of your or my time.
Since you are talking shares anyway, why not simply issue so many common stock shares that they are tiny value per share, comparable to a cryptocurrency value per coin or maybe less since shares have no decimal-places they are whole things, integer things; issue the shares on an existing platform such as HORIZON or NXT or Ethereum or the like, and use the API of that platform from your app to let people earn shares.
-MarkM-
Issuing shares means he can go to jail for
issuing unregistered investment securities.
Thanks. To answer, I have zero interest in a pump and dump. In fact, all coins would be distributed to users and the company would own none.
If you were working within the marketing plan I contemplated for my altcoin, your company could also get some coins too. So that is another way you monetize your app in addition to any other ways you already planned.
In terms of tipping other users, I believe that should be enabled but not directly associated with voting because that would act as a disincentive to upvoting. Instead, the company would be the original fount of all coins.
Yes you should be a faucet for coins, but these coins should not be just for your app, but for many 100s of apps (done by others). More faucets, more scaling.
Dogecoin was apparently successful with users tipping. I am not sure if tipping is a disincentive to voting. Seems to correlate well to upvoting and disincentivizes vote spamming. If you want votes to more accurately reflect value, IMO they shouldn't be free and thus users need coins to vote (but of course do what you think is best if you feel that interferes too much with your usership ... remember I don't know your entire model so I can't access details like that within your overall model for this app).
In terms of millions of users, that's the long-term goal. In fact, you are exactly right about the 1000s of users being the correct short term goal, as we will be location-based.
Again a perfect fit to the marketing plan I was contemplating. Exactly what I was thinking that some apps would be more specialized (e.g. location based), thus aggregating many apps through one coin would provide network effects to all those apps plus the coin. Again I think you should take this private messages with me, because I don't want to discuss all my plans in public yet (and also not sure about my plans).
As long as the coin works, I'm perfectly happy to fork litecoin or whatever. I see no shame in the term "copycoin", imitation being the highest form of flattery.
Seems I can't get you to appreciate the value of interopting on scaling through a common coin with other apps. And I can't get you to appreciate to focus on your core competency and not try to do everything yourself. If we can't make headway on this understanding, then I need to invest my time else where. Thanks for the discussion.