By the way how do you respond to the fact you said maged agreed that I was swindling people? All he said was I made dishonest statements (and this was never actually shown).
Dishonest statements, defrauding people, swindling are all excellent descriptions of your business models (do you really want to nitpick on the definition of every single word). Unfortunately nobody can read up on how you do business, because you deleted over 1000 posts. Which is a fraudulent act in itself in my book.
Further to that you outright claim I swindled people with fraudulent business schemed (see section DEEPLINK item 4 in OP). How do you respond to this? Because you haven't responded the last 5 times I asked you for an explanation (see recent "falsifying NAV" thread).
How do I respond to my own claim? I agree with it.
You cannot make such claims without proof, especially when I have provided plausable explainations. To do so is to commit
fraud.1. You MUST show how I have swindled people and show that actual people exist who have been swindled.
2. You MUST show which of my businesses were fraudulent (i.e. were created out of an intent to decieve for financial gain). In doing so you must also show the financial gain.
Failure to do so means you have committed fraud, and deserve at the least a scammer tag.
Why?
Because you defrauded me out of potential business, defrauded me by injuring my reputation. I've already demonstrated, documented at least three direct financial losses I experienced as a result of statements similar to yours. You cannot be allowed to make such statements without providing proof that they are true. I demand you show that I swindled money and that I engaged in fraudulent business practices, or failing that I demand you receive a scammer tag so that no one else is ever fooled by your bullshit again.
You are not here to do business. You are here solely to commit fraud.