* A is making transactions, B, C and D are vying for endorsements and all have a connection to A.
B, C, D are other nodes, just like A
So are you trying to say that endorsements are some form of a voting reputation power? How is this measured and by whom, because one of the problems in consensus is determining what is the truth, and even the record of the voting power can have a Byzantine fault. You see I need a holitistic map because I (attempt to) think all of all the variables. You are throwing away information, which is why you think it is simple and thus don't see your flaws or at least you haven't articulated all the information I need to analyze it.
You are not of superior intellect to deserve to talk condescendingly to me.
* It is the role of the endorsed nodes to vote on what the current state of the ledger should be, and the state with the maximum votes wins.
Reason for B, C, D existence
Yeah but again you don't provide a holistic understanding. How do they get chosen, how is it recorded, what does this endorsement metric do and how, etc..
You probably have put it in your mind that I am just against you and that I am not open-minded. But that is your own problem. I am not thinking that way. I am trying to load your model in my head, but you are not providing sufficient information.