Quote from: notbatman on January 13, 2016, 11:21:38 AM

Don't forget his meeting with the CFR!

Oh, and Bitcoin Classic, sounds like a new brand of fags; smoke 'em if you got 'em!

CFR gavinerie added to the list!

Quote from: Lauda on January 13, 2016, 10:29:15 AM

Please rename the title to fit the discussion. Some could argue that it doesn't matter who is behind the code, but it does even though Bitcoin is trustless. If there is going to be a switch of the developers, then we need people who are better than the current ones; not suspicious and controversial. Also the signatures by bad actors (e.g. Long) are worthless.

Sorry, I found the name quite fitting the discussion about all the actions gavin will/has undertook to discredit himself and bring cryptoshame to his name.

Gavineries:

Quote from: onemorexmr on January 13, 2016, 12:41:58 PM

Quote from: siameze on January 13, 2016, 12:39:37 PM

Quote from: hdbuck on January 12, 2016, 09:35:56 PM

Keeping track and discussing the Chief Scientist "Gavineries".

Some referenced list would have included:

- Meeting with CIA
- Association with bankrupted "Bitcoin Foundation" and renown scammers a la Mark Karpelese
- MIT eg. US Gov payroll
- Hearnia wingman in contentious social engineered fork attempt branded as "Bitcoin XT"

I always found it quite interesting that Satoshi vanished right after Gavin announced his meeting with the CIA. Coincidence?

probably not a coincidence.
but thinking gavin works together with CIA to harm bitcoin is a stretch IMHO

No coincidence, he even admitted it himself:

Quote from: Atlas on September 28, 2012, 03:44:27 AM

Gavin had just received the alert keys to the Bitcoin network. Right afterwards, he tells Satoshi that he is visiting the CIA. Satoshi leaves for good coincidentally.

This is quoted from the defunct Bruce Wagner Bitcoin podcast:

Bruce Wagner : When was the last time you chatted to satoshi
Gavin Andresen: Um... I haven't had email from satoshi in a couple months actually. The last email I sent him I actually told him I was going to talk at the CIA. So it's possible , that.... that may have um had something to with his deciding

Based on this, do you think Gavin fully meets Satoshi's vision for Bitcoin?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113609.0

You just don't friendly chitchat with the CIA.. And it is even more critical when involving such disruptive technology as Bitcoin.
Taking a coffee break and counting flowers with them would be much more of a stretch imo.