Quote from: Indianacoin on January 14, 2016, 06:21:47 PM

Quote from: shorena on January 14, 2016, 06:13:55 PM

Which brings us back to the question which of the following is the preferred action.

If the network forgets about the transaction and the scammer has not lost anything
-OR-
If the transaction is rebroadcasted until it is confirmed even though it might take a few weeks.

How can he make a mistake all of a sudden when he had already confirmed outbound transactions with 0.0001 BTC fee? For example --- https://blockchain.info/tx/6e17e39d4bf8a0c431c5f762ed140acb883b056609ee880938e3f886992f68f5

Prolly none other than a scam attempt IMHO.

Quote from: shorena on January 14, 2016, 06:13:55 PM

After all anyone that knows about the transaction has the power to remind the network about it.

That's why I already advised op not to rebroadcast it because he has not sent him anything on Skrill and the transaction will obviously get cancelled if no reminder is attempted on the network.

Maybe I wasnt clear enough. ~PayPal-Trader~ scammed 0.1457 BTC. Lets assume you are sardasa here. The TX would give you 0.1163 btc from the scammer. Would you return the 0.1163 btc to the scammer or the victim of one of their scams?