Quote from: Amph on January 17, 2016, 09:03:30 AM

Quote from: wuzamarine on January 16, 2016, 04:08:19 PM

Quote from: Amph on January 15, 2016, 09:03:35 AM

the same will happen, with cryptsy like it happened with bitstamp, no coins back, they are gone, nada, zero, they are in the hands of thief

can you name me a single complex technology the flew perfect on the first try?
There is a REASON bitcoind is v0.1 at this time.
Running an exchange still has some work to do as well.
When the technology reaches v1.0, you can rest assured. But by then you will have missed the boat and just along for the ride.

but this has more to do with the negligency of the owner, and not the technology, so i'm afraid nothing will change in the future if the people are dump and don't care about the money of the other

i'm sure that if there were their money there they would have been more diligent and cautious

exactly -- this is human (mis-)bevahiour, don't blame it on "Bitcoin technology"... Also, the case is different from Bitstamp and others where "coins have gone" or are "in the hands of thieves" because at Cryptsy, user coins are in segregated accounts and showing until the site goes (went) offline as "user balance" or "account value" belonging to account holders.

These will have to be distributed 1:1 as individual user property in case of a bankruptcy, this is why a group lawsuit, bankruptcy proceedings, class action etc are needed -- the quota fractions can only be distributed for the remaining lump sum (if any) belonging to Cryptsy's own assets to settle other creditors' claims (the landlord on whom Cryptsy moved out so suddenly and apparently without notice comes to mind here, etc).

It all depends on what kind of lawsuit there will be and if people are smart enough to drop that stupid Go-to-Jail thing long enough for the culprits to be available and forced to co-operate on the return of recoverable user assets.