Quote from: BenTuras on January 15, 2016, 07:17:54 AM

Figuring out who owns the btc addresses that received the multiple 1000BTC transactions could lay in the small amounts that are also received on those addresses.

Not really. People send these tiny transactions as a form of cheap advertising. Just scam the blockchain for the 10,000 most "interesting" addresses (most active, highest balance, most famous) and send them some dust from your vanity address. Personally it leaves me with a negative association ("factom == spammer") but I guess it must work, or they wouldn't keep doing it.

Either way, you can't assume a connection between factom and the thief just because because factom sent some dust to the same addresses that hold the stolen coins.

Quote from: peonminer on January 15, 2016, 09:31:02 AM

How THE FUCK is a cold wallet jacked??? "We were alerted" yeah fucking right. Did mullick have to stop his reach around on you for five seconds to "alert" you?? Because your tight ass security did not scan every time before putting the cold wallet online?

You don't put cold wallets online. Because they are cold.

Quote from: Gleb Gamow on January 15, 2016, 06:58:38 PM

ALL THAT'S PENNED IN THE TRUST SECTION OF THIS FORUM IS NOT INDEXED BY ANY SEARCH ENGINE ON THE INTERNET. Pretty amazing, eh?

That's because you can't see trust feedback if you aren't logged in. Presumably the search engine spiders don't log in when crawling the web.