Quote from: jonald_fyookball on January 20, 2016, 02:19:23 AM

Quote from: BitUsher on January 20, 2016, 01:56:20 AM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on January 20, 2016, 01:28:43 AM

Quote from: BitUsher on January 20, 2016, 01:07:41 AM

.. I was open to using bitcoin classic in the past now I won't even consider touching it with my experience talking with their supporters...

awww..billy gonna take his ball and go home? Cry

I am more puzzled and disappointing than upset as profit is a much lower priority to what interests me with bitcoin . You are another example of a bitcoin classic supporter who is very poorly educated and constantly spreading misinformation. Its almost as if you are a troll... but I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are merely very misinformed.

Ok, so enlighten me then. What's the #1 thing in your opinion that you believe I'm misinformed about?

look through your own post history, I and others have seen you repeatedly spreading false statements:

Here is one example among many :

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on January 17, 2016, 03:52:39 AM

That's why we're in this mess and should be
as obvious as the fact that the emperor is wearing no clothes. Those that
can't tell have bought into some dogma that "core must be right" while ignoring
the obvious facts that Core has done nothing but stall and fail to increase
transaction capacity, despite a lot of good sounding "ideas" like "lightning",
"scalability conferences", "segwit",...and that the same guys in core (everyone
except Gavin and Garzik) who are against meaningful blocksize increases work
for a private company called Blockstream who is in the business of blockchain
technology.

I'm sure I sound like a broken record by now to some, but you asked me directly
and I'm telling you the reality as I see it.

In the statement above you are supporting the conspiracy theory that Core is delibretely and secretly stalling. You assert they are just spreading a lot of "ideas" or marketing rhetoric. The evidence, Code and testing, suggests otherwise.

Than you go on to suggest the lie that everyone who works for core, "besides Gavin and Garzik" who are against meaningful blocksize increases work for blockstream. Really? All remaining 43(active commits in 2015) core devs either support large blocks or work for Blockstream?...You can't be serious, as this is easily dis-proven.