Quote from: onemorexmr on January 17, 2016, 03:42:36 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on January 17, 2016, 03:37:01 PM

Quote from: onemorexmr on January 17, 2016, 03:33:43 PM

Unsigned Message: Thats not satoshi...

satoshi would know that a signed message is needed if he is interested that his opinion is recognized

That would make that particular issue settle by his intervention BUT it would reinforce the point that if an authority can impose their opinion by their "status" then the system is broken.

It would create a precedent where in each dispute satoshi must say his opinion with a signed message which would in turn prove that BTC is centralized around his decisions.

you are right.

but your poll suggests that this message is from satoshi. so i am not able to answer it...

The vote in "No" is a superset of "this post is faked". If one believes it's fake, then why would they take the warning seriously?