Quote from: dmwardjr on January 17, 2016, 10:26:09 PM

Quote from: scyth3 on January 17, 2016, 10:15:49 PM

Quote from: dmwardjr on January 17, 2016, 10:11:16 PM

The article says the following:

The moratorium was later refined to only high-density applicants WHO'S BUSINESS WOULD USE 250 kilowatt hours of electricity per square foot of space per year, but less than 5 average megawatts overall. Users of more than 5 megawatts need a power contract with the PUD.

Since it says, "WHO'S BUSINESS WOULD USE" instead of "WHO'S BUILDING WOULD USE," I would have to be cautious. I need to find out more from the PUD before signing my name on the dotted line. Can you tell me what PUD it is? Is this Chelan or Douglas?

They use the square footage indicated in public records from my conversations with Chelan PUD on previous projects. If there are any objections then the burden of proof is on the customer. They do not come in to perform inspections on your property related to the square footage.

Like I told you in PM, I prefer not to say where it is located until I have a background and credit check.

Why should I bother with giving my personal information if the burden of proof is on the customer? I'm the customer. I would hate to drive over 2,500 miles with my belongings and rigs in tow only to find out I will not pay 3 cents per kWh but a little over 5 cents per kWh instead. I can get 4.5 cents per kWh in Texas.

Would you mind finding a post by the PUD stipulating the moratorium is applied to the entire space of a building even though it is divided into multiple units?

We are paying you a "finders fee" of $1,000. Will you, "The Finder" provide this information to us please?

I'm not trying to be difficult. I just think it's important to know.

None of what we are talking about is even approved by the board yet. So there isn't anything to look up. It is nothing more than a proposal, but I told you all of what I know and got from the PUDs.