Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)

The core development team had more than enough time now to design a version of Bitcoin that allows scalability.

Core has already designed "a version of Bitcoin that allows scalability."

Is that the one that Nobody Wants^tm?

Nobody Wants a contentious hard fork and subsequent catastrophic consensus failure, except XT/Unlimited/Classic dead-enders (but you guys don't matter, because Bitcoin is not a democracy).

The people who matter support Core. Here, have some Fact Welfare you poor, low-information Toominista.

https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-core/capacity-increases

Why don't you follow your role model Mike Hearn's example, and ride off into the sunset?

You've got the whining part down, now you just need to GTFO. Wink

You are always so angry. I love that about you.... Cool

So whataya got for me?

Contentious fork? No such thing. It either forks with over 75% behind it or it doesn't happen. Just coz you are crying does not make it contentious.
Catastrophic Consensus Failure? See first point. You can swim against the tide all you like, bitcoin will move on without you.
Bitcoin is not a democracy? This does not equal "Developer X decides the future" Its consnesus - what the majority follow is what becomes the standard. you cant influence it or subvert it.
People who matter support core? Not anymore. They had their chance and blew it. The market is tired of their procrastination and buying time waiting for their overly complex solutions.
Whining? Me? Grin