Quote from: CIYAM on January 19, 2016, 02:19:46 PM

Quote from: patmast3r on January 19, 2016, 02:18:22 PM

Whatever...let's not derail the thread but i wrote "Judging by IOTA" because i used it as a reference point and though that would be worth pointing out. Was I supposed to write "Judging by the one existing example I'm not allowed to name" ?

So let's get back on topic on not talk about IOTA but instead the fact that a "small POW" doesn't work!

The reason being that it is easily defeated by a large set of dedicated servers (read @monsterer's topic for more on this).

anonymint/TPTB_need_war explicitly refers to IOTA on line 4 of his OP

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on January 08, 2016, 06:58:11 PM

Let's have a frank discussion about the technical realities of crypto-currency.

Apologies in advance to all those who have worked so hard on trying to advance crypto currency. I am not doing this to spite you. I don't want to waste more time. If we can convince ourselves we have a solution worth working on, then let's do it. Otherwise let's be honest with ourselves.

Edit: for those who want to jump straight to understanding how Iota's DAG works, click here.

Why should it not be allowed to talk about Iota anymore?
Looks like the most "advanced" DAG-based coin until now, therefore referring to it is perfectly adequate.