Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)
by
BitUsher
on 20/01/2016, 15:23:34 UTC

Yes, your cynicism is palpable.  I agree.

I thought I just did "honestly admit" that I was speaking in general terms.  

I really don't see any "lies" or "back peddling" or "rationalizations" or "caveats".  
Why don't you pull out your thesaurus and see if you can paint an even darker
picture here?  Cheesy

What is the MAIN POINT, THE ESSENCE of what I'm saying?

People like Luke, Matt, Greg, and Pieter are major players in core and also are/were involved
with Blockstream.  If you take away Jeff and Gavin, sure there are others who contribute
but they aren't very influential.  

I admit, saying "everyone" was an innacuracy, and I'm more than happy to
admit that, but I haven't misled anyone (at least intentionally).   Most people
know there are many contributors to the open source project.

That's was my point the whole time and I think you know this was my point,
and I think you know my point is valid.

I believe you are splitting hairs in an attempt to discredit me but
its not working.  Go attack someone else.

~Apology accepted... please try and be more careful next time with your statements as we already have enough miscommunication
as is. It is not my intention to attack you but simply clear the air and make sure people aren't spreading false information (intentionally or unintentionally) Please correct any misstatements I make in the future as I wish to be as fair and accurate as possible as well.

----------------------------------------

In other news --

https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/

wangchun from F2Pool is planning with some core devs yesterday for a planned 2MB hard fork and adding extra nonce space in feb/march 2017 to increase effective capacity up to ~4MB.