Quote from: usagi on November 28, 2012, 01:18:30 AM

Quote from: Bitcoin Oz on November 27, 2012, 10:49:53 PM

Quote from: ciuciu on November 27, 2012, 10:41:52 PM

You were partner, but now you like to call yourself shareholder. How convenient!

I owned bitcoinglobal shares on glbse and went to shareholder meetings. I also own telstra shares in Australia and go to the annual general shareholder meeting. Exactly what different level of liability does that imply Im not aware of ?

You are intentionally misrepresenting the nature of your position as a "shareholder". You were NOT a "shareholder" in that sense, and you KNOW it.

Please allow me to quote from the Bitcoin Global Governing Bylaws:

Quote

Part 4 - Membership
1. A person shall be considered to be a Member if they own at least one share of
BitcoinGlobal.
2. A Member is accorded the following rights, privileges, and obligations;
1. An equal vote in the Voting Process for each share.
2. The right to put forth motions requiring Member votes.
3. The right to second motions put forth by another Member.
4. The obligation to make their best effort to participate in the Voting Process and to
maintain a Forum account for that purpose.
5. The obligation to provide up to date e-mail contact information with the
BitcoinGlobal Secretary.
6. The obligation to keep a GPG key pair, to make the public key available to all
members, and to keep the private key secure.
7. The obligation to verify the public GPG keys of other members and to have the
same done for your own public key.

You were a MEMBER. And as you had voting rights during minutes, this "member" means "member of the board".

That's point one.

Point two is, as a member of the Bitcoin Global board, have you ever agreed to cover up a crime for the purpose of financial gain? Think about that one.

What crime.

For the record in your thread you are proposing a financial crime by preferencing some shareholders over the others. I didnt say you were a criminal. Am I supposed to just ignore that ?