Quote from: Bitcoin Oz on November 27, 2012, 11:10:47 PM

Quote from: ciuciu on November 27, 2012, 10:58:45 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin Oz on November 27, 2012, 10:52:33 PM

Quote from: ciuciu on November 27, 2012, 10:41:52 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin Oz on November 27, 2012, 10:36:25 PM

Quote from: bitcoinbear on November 27, 2012, 09:58:25 PM

Quote from: Bitcoin Oz on November 27, 2012, 09:30:16 PM

My question is by owning shares in them should you have unlimited liability if the operator goes rogue ?

I have not heard of any examples of people trying to get money from shareholders? Your loss is limited to the amount you put in.

Its been said many times that the glbse shareholders are liable for nefarios actions.

I am saying that I am essentially being treated on the same level as Nefario. I may as well have a scammer tag because people misunderstand the roles of shareholders and operators. I have been called a scammer and a "co conspirator".

Someone offering a security without a proper shareholder agreement is essentially entrapping the unwary and people need to be aware of it.

You were partner, but now you like to call yourself shareholder. How convenient! Haven't seen any of you suing Nefario. Nobody knows his whereabouts. You all must have been the stupidest shareholders!

You can find the info yourself its not that hard. Hes not hiding in anyones basement.

As for being a stupid shareholder ask the same thing of enron shareholders.

You had voting decision and you took BTC out of GLBSE. You did not take any safeguards to not let this happen! In my eyes you are liable, your actions will cost me money and reputation.

I voted to sack Nefario. What do you expect to accomplish with 2% of the vote ?

You should have made a motion to have a copy of the database at all time, to protect your investment and mine. Lucky for all of you, you didn't.