Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on January 21, 2016, 10:46:06 PM

Quote from: RealBitcoin on January 21, 2016, 03:57:33 PM

Quote from: thejaytiesto on January 21, 2016, 03:01:45 PM

To be honest I think Roger Ver agrees with Classic so when he is asked in interviews why he agrees with classic he can subtlety drop an advertisement about his website. "By the way Classic is censored in the official reddit thats why we created Bitcoin.com..." it's not that subtle actually.

Yes the censorship sucks, and they will use that against us to gain credibility. I think censorship should not be done even if we are right, it is just a bad thing to do.

it was in no way censorship, you've bought into the double-speak of the sock-puppets and shills who were over-running the legitimate bitcoin forums before better moderation showed up (notice how they still jealously covet getting a voice on these "hated censored forums") ... it was totally out of control, there was no debate before, just a loud cacophony of propaganda ... once they go to their "own" forums they had nothing to say and just started tearing strips off each other.

Wow that's amusing, there are certainly dozens of suckpuppets on this forum, the way you can buy easily 20-30 legendary accounts for a cost.

So what, it costs 10-15 BTC for the enemy to sow discontent with legendary or hero accounts. Clever and cheap. For 15 BTC is really nothing if you want to sabotage BTC.

Few legendary accounts leading the propaganda, and a few more member/jr. member sockpuppets to confirm their position, and done, you have changed the public opinion.

Now I see why the moderators have to clean up this mess Cheesy