Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 22, 2016, 03:35:34 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on January 21, 2016, 06:07:33 AM

Come on. Corporations is where the meat & potatos is for privacy block chains likely will be.

You guys spent hours debating me on Monday that corporations have no use for blockchains... Roll Eyes

In our prior discussion about Bitshares, I explicitly excluded smart contracts and IoT. I had agreed with smooth that Daniel Larimer's DACs (Decentralized Autononomous Corporations) seem to have no application to reality, because a corporation by definition is a hierarchical structure. If corporations are not hierarchical (and not with a representative voting structure), then we don't need corporations and we can just have decentralized individuals interacting via smart contracts on a block chain. Please review the posts I made in that Nxt thread to confirm what I said.

Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 22, 2016, 03:35:34 AM

@TPTB At least we can agree on something... that Zerocash provides superior anonymity. I have been saying this for a long time, and is the reason I never got on the Monero train. I have always said that eventually better anonymity technology would come out and render Monero outdated and useless since it is its one and only feature.

And I even recently explained Monero's block chain tech does not solve the mining Tragedy of the Commons.

Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 22, 2016, 03:35:34 AM

I recently bought some Monero because their marketing is on point on this forum (aka spam...), but I am going to be betting big on Zcoin when it is out of alpha.

I know you're going to respond with the "Zcoin is fundamentally flawed"

It is Z.cash, not Zcoin. Zerocoin was an older version of the technology which is inferior.

My major complaint is that Z.cash will be requiring miners to pay 11% of the coinbase mining rewards to the corporation. That violates FinCEN guidance that would require all miners to register as MSBs and it will incentivize others to fork the block chain to remove the subsidy.

And they do not have my block chain tech so scaling will be an issue, but either they can copy mine (or similar) or vice versa. And my interest in their technology is not for their block chain tech.

Other than that, I am interested in the project.

Note I reserve the right to find other flaws in Zerocash in the future.

Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 22, 2016, 03:35:34 AM

b.s. you say about every cryptocurrency, and follow it up with "I am 100x smarter than you peasant.

Please read how a B-lister behaves and realize comments such as the above fit the description. Elevate your discourse to A-lister if you can.

Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 22, 2016, 03:35:34 AM

I have been doing this since 1842, and you are a child, scammer and a fool."

Not understanding some of key weaknesses of PoS and the hyperbole Bitshares promulgates exemplifies that I was correct about your inexperience. It doesn't mean you can't learn and that you won't sometimes have good insight. I can see some intellect and potential from you, but you need to learn to stop that B-lister crap and distinguish expertise from bullshit.

Quote from: CoinHoarder on January 22, 2016, 03:35:34 AM

However, I am just going to ignore it because you don't understand how cryptocurrencies derive their value, and you can't be convinced that you are wrong about anything. (hint: it does not 100% have to do with the technology of the cryptocurrency... although technology is a plus)

There you go again. And the adoption of Bitshares is 2 or 3 users? I forgot.