Quote from: wpalczynski on January 22, 2016, 04:51:29 AM

How come you are cross posting from all these different threads into your blog right here?

Because your master smooth has been regularly censoring my posts in your Monero Speculation thread. And he tried to convince GingerAle to censor some of my posts in the Monero Technical Improvement thread. So to be safe (since it is difficult to copy them from PMs after they are deleted), I copy them to my thread to exemplify how ridiculous it is that you all are censoring crap and forcing me to put Monero discussion in my thread instead of the official Monero threads.

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on January 22, 2016, 08:19:32 AM

Quote from: generalizethis on January 22, 2016, 06:18:58 AM

The Monero Devs are developing the tech first, market second and are using the motto of "under promise and over deliver," whereas it seems you are working under the motto of "Over promise, say it's impossible and then move onto the next idea," which is still better than the dash motto, "Over promise and say you've got a better idea when most people figure out that you lied or can't deliver."

My point is if they have no clue where they are headed marketing wise, then the tech is likely to be wrong. And I think that has become the case. I see a complete rewrite will be necessary to adopt Zerocash technology and to fix the block scaling, mining Tragedy of the Commons.

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on January 22, 2016, 08:52:23 AM

Quote from: cryptodromeda on January 22, 2016, 08:39:07 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on January 22, 2016, 08:19:32 AM

My point is if they have no clue where they are headed marketing wise.

Coming from the person who brought us knife fork and plate coin.

Thanks for proving me correct.

Graphic arts is not marketing. Try rereading my post to understand that I pointed out Linux's marketing was the identification of a synergy with a natural need of corporations to replace proprietary operating systems. Monero's current technology does not synergize with corporations and private block chains for corporations is the only viable (legal) market I see for anonymity. Thus Monero has failed to do the most basic marketing analysis that one does before starting a project. Those who confuse marketing with promotion exemplify their total lack of knowledge of the field of marketing.

As you well know I explained in the Aeon thread that I was brainstorming and produced that image in 30 seconds as a way to exemplify what didn't work visually and why.

Monero/Aeon community only know how to attack and never to listen, learn, and be receptive to all open source input. That is why your coin projects will crash and burn.

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on January 22, 2016, 09:34:52 AM

Quote from: generalizethis on January 22, 2016, 09:19:44 AM

Cryptodromeda's point may be that you miss the obvious sometimes. And design work is part of marketing.

Everyone misses the obvious sometimes (and especially when rushing and not trying to be exacting), and my point is Monero folks think they know everything and don't need to listen to anyone. And they censor what they don't want to hear. And they never identified their strategic market.

Design work is one (small) aspect of implementing a marketing strategy. Marketing is about identifying markets and the necessary implementation to achieve those markets. So graphic design is very far down the food chain of marketing (except perhaps in an arena where graphical arts is the major component of the market, e.g. selling art).

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on January 22, 2016, 09:52:26 AM

I've also noticed that Monero has been inserting itself in numerous Wikipedia pages. Here is an example:

Quote from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooko%27s_triangle

Other platforms which refute Zooko's conjecture, include: Twister and Monero OpenAlias.

Monero seems to have not understood that willynilly promotion is ~~useless~~[counterproductive and perceived as spam] without a marketing strategy.