Lauda, so in addition to the 'quadratic' risk (for which you admit there is a fix but core is not implementing),
you're also giving us the 'nothing is better than something' argument.
So let's set the situation straight. We have two proposals: you're also giving us the 'nothing is better than something' argument.
1. 2MB Block size
- doubles the theoretical tps
- introduces a new attack vector
- Simple change
- Hard fork
2. SegWit
- Fixes transaction malleability
- Fraud proofs
- Simpler script upgrades
- Theoretical tps possibly equal or higher than with 2 MB blocks depending on adoption
- Somewhat complex; decent complexity for inexperienced users
- Soft fork
I'm definitely shilling for Core because obviously SegWit is not far superior to a 'simple' block size increase.
I 'don't seem to always support them'. Do I support them in 'Core vs Classic', 'SegWit vs 2 MB blocks'? Yes.[/list]HUH?
if its not far superior then why do it?
Also dont see what that has to do with your comment of "we would have this same discussion very soon if growth is going to increase".
whatevs.