Quote from: Lauda on January 22, 2016, 06:41:27 AM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on January 22, 2016, 05:39:05 AM

Lauda, so in addition to the 'quadratic' risk (for which you admit there is a fix but core is not implementing),
you're also giving us the 'nothing is better than something' argument.

So let's set the situation straight. We have two proposals:

1. 2MB Block size

doubles the theoretical tps
introduces a new attack vector
Simple change
Hard fork

2. SegWit

Fixes transaction malleability
Fraud proofs
Simpler script upgrades
Theoretical tps possibly equal or higher than with 2 MB blocks depending on adoption
Somewhat complex; decent complexity for inexperienced users
Soft fork

I'm definitely shilling for Core because obviously SegWit is not far superior to a 'simple' block size increase. Roll Eyes

I 'don't seem to always support them'. Do I support them in 'Core vs Classic', 'SegWit vs 2 MB blocks'? Yes.[/list]

HUH?

if its not far superior then why do it?

Also dont see what that has to do with your comment of "we would have this same discussion very soon if growth is going to increase".

whatevs.

Roll Eyes