Quote from: usagi on November 28, 2012, 04:34:31 PM

Quote from: kjj on November 28, 2012, 04:12:12 PM

Quote from: usagi on November 28, 2012, 03:53:49 PM

Half of the problem here is that I am honest and I like to disclose information. Most people don't bother (and this is probably why).

No, the whole problem is that western jurisprudence has clearly decided how these things are to be done, a set of standards and practices refined over the last two thousand years, but you are ignoring your clearly defined fiduciary obligations and just doing whatever the fuck you want.

No, I'm not.

Just because I sold a single that CPA owned does not mean I am giving preference to myself or to CPA. As soon as the other shareholder lists come in there will be PLENTY of bitcoins and shares to go around. It's like YARR. I will be paying out YARR before I pay out on NYAN or BMF. Do you know why? Hint: It's not because I am committing financial fraud (hint: I am not committing financial fraud). It is because I have proof of who owns those shares.

get it? The thing I need most to move forward on a claim is to know who owns the shares, so that I may begin divvying up the money.

Next time do yourself a favor and don't make baseless accusations or accuse someone of committing a crime without actually understanding what is going on. It makes you look like a retard.

I've made no accusations. You said what you were doing, namely acting in your capacity of trustee to sell an asset held in trust by you, for the purpose of paying one beneficiary preferentially. What you said you were doing was the textbook definition of a crime, namely fraud. It is also an actionable civil matter commonly known as "breach of fiduciary duty by a trustee".