Quote from: Richy_T on January 23, 2016, 01:04:03 AM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on January 21, 2016, 05:43:27 PM

This, however, doesn't show who's mining empty blocks.

Do you want that? I can get you that.

Last 1008 blocks (7 days).

-snip-

Looks like antpool is the baddy again.

I could swear I saw some f2pool on blockchain.info though.

Not really, but for whoever that mattered I'm sure it's nice.

Quote from: Richy_T on January 23, 2016, 12:57:54 AM

Quote from: kano on January 23, 2016, 12:52:02 AM

Quote from: Richy_T on January 22, 2016, 05:56:01 PM

Forget empty blocks, antpool appears to be mining with their soft limit still at 750000 (as are slush and a few others).

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/426fjx/so_whos_mining_small_blocks_answer_inside/

If you dont like the idea of leaving money on the table, I'd suggest moving to another pool.

Edit: Hmm, I see miners don't get the fees from the pool so probably moot. Not great for the nework though.

Heh I see you didn't like to point out the two pools that have the highest average block size Cheesy

(Edit: there's a reason why many pools mine empty or small blocks and we don't ...)

That's orthogonal to my point and to be honest, I'm not sure which that is.

I'm assuming you mean your pool, ckpool? If so, good on you. Cheesy

To be honest, I run p2pool (ideological reasons) and my backup is antpool but I may have to throw you guys in as #2.

I'd be interested as to why elegius is doing so bad but I here Luke-jr is no longer affiliated (?)

By the looks of things you'd probably be better off pointing your GPUs at Kano soon. Unless Kano is planning to follow the majority?