Quote from: skuser on January 24, 2016, 06:07:04 AM

Quote from: philipma1957 on January 23, 2016, 07:22:54 PM

so the swing we see could be 198ph running at 0.06 watts slow speed and 363 running at .11 watts top speed.

that is very close to the 165 gh swing we see.

if you are the only company in the world that can do this why not run like they do. Especially if you want bitcoin to continue.

I am missing logic behind this. What's the difference between turning all gear on and let the diff rise within one two periods and doing it slowlier? Only difference is that you'll mine LESS bitcoins when switching the gear on and off. I think that someone just added about 100 PH recently and the jumps between 700-1000 PH is variance within 'real' 850 PH which we are finally approaching with difficulty change.

stick with variance if it works for you..

but lets try a different way to explain this.

I can crank my in house gear up to 32th or down to 24th.

At 24th it is more efficient and is easy to run 0 overheating and no breakdowns.

At 32th it is less efficient and is harder to run lots of over heating and some breakdowns.

I am bit fury I can run my gear at 200ph it is more efficient and it is easy to run 0 overheating and no breakdowns

I can run my gear at 360 ph it is less efficient to run lots of overheating and breakdowns

If I max to 360 it does a bigger profit then running at 200., but there is overheating so I run it at 360ph until it gets too hot then I back off to 200ph

This is the flux down from 850 to 700 and back up to 1000.

If you look at stats this fits. But if you want to say variance that fits.

which is more likely. I think I am not you.

That is the fun of a spec thread.

As I could be wrong .
you could be wrong .
we both could be wrong.
I could be right.
you could be right.
or maybe it is a bit of both.