Quote from: JJ12880 on January 26, 2016, 02:01:24 AM

Quote from: ozboy2014 on January 26, 2016, 12:33:16 AM

Quote from: goblynn on January 25, 2016, 10:37:28 PM

Quote from: leigh2k14 on January 25, 2016, 07:06:07 PM

Quote from: JJ12880 on January 25, 2016, 05:20:23 PM

Sure thing! larger documents require a large amount of Radon asset to store, to discourage bloating the blockchain. The Recommended method for such documents, would be to store the hash, and then store the hash in the blockchain. This still provides proof of the time the document was recorded, and prevents any alterations to the document. If the document were to be changed after the hash is recorded, the document would no longer verify.

I'm starting to see the potential in this, WOW!

btw the smartchain client hashes the file and stores the hash on the blockchain automatically

eta for public realse of Phase 2?

As soon as I can fix a few more minor issues, beta in slack went better than expected.

jj i really tried...im sorry