Quote from: Quickseller on January 26, 2016, 05:31:15 AM

Quote from: The Pharmacist on January 26, 2016, 05:28:15 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 26, 2016, 05:08:35 AM

Quote from: The Pharmacist on January 25, 2016, 11:51:59 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 25, 2016, 10:59:34 PM

nor9865 has a history of leaving trust from his alt accounts in order to make his alts appear more trustworthy then they really are. In the past he left positive trust for Netpyder.....just saying....

Not trying to hijack this thread, but as I might be interested in doing bitcoin-->cash through the mail with OP at some point, just what are you saying? Are you implying that OP and nor9865 are one and the same? If yes, then show the proof. If not, then what you said makes not a shit of difference.

I am just stating the fact that nor9865 was previously used to provide positive trust feedback to one of his alt accounts for a currency exchange trade that did not actually happen. The conclusion that nor9865 is the same person as the OP is one that you made after I pointed out the above fact and that nor9865 gave a positive review to the OP.

There is obviously no blockchain evidence connecting the OP to other accounts considering that he never posted any addresses (IIRC), and the very small number of posts it has made overall, although there are huge gaps (in time) in the OP's post history.

If you are going to transact with cash in the mail, then one party (or both) needs to have huge amounts of trust. Even if you video tape the packaging/opening of an envelope, there would be nothing to stop one party from tampering with the envelope before/after the video stops.

Read what I wrote. You stated a fact, and I am questioning with good reason why you chose to state that fact here. If you have no proof of anything then your comment is out of place.

Nope, not out of place. I am pointing out a reason why any statement that nor9865 makes that describes a positive trading experience, or opines that someone else can be trusted should be taken with a grain of salt.

Quote from: Timelord2067 on January 26, 2016, 05:24:31 AM

As you can see, no evidence, just speculation - ie defamation.

Nothing that I said is speculation.

you see the reason why i am not worried about you is, you have a very interresting mind and i love to follow your post when im bored. ive read a lot from your "previous post by user".

ive noticed something very very common in your scam accusations and sometimes scams that were really going on.

you seem to know a lot about those move of self vouching or tricking other people.

the scam accusations that you point out, seems like scam that you were actually accused of being authored. if not, then NOT YET ACCUSED.

Quickscammer, face it, you will never be on the default trust again. and make sure in the following post you dont whine about not wanting to be on the default trust or blablabla.

the thing is, you sold your reputation, your respect, your status you had on the forum, for a few bucks. and for that.

Shame on you

also, make sure to follow my posts, there is something that will happen on my profile and you would jump to comment or scam accused me. just keep yourself updated with my posts. give me 48 to 72more hours.

p.s i am sure you will use your alts to do whatever i think you will be doing. but you will be bashing me on this profile.

Quickscammer, there is a saying that goes like this in english : you dont run around saying your neighbour has a pebble in his garden when you have a mountain in yours.

Cheers

p.s to OP, sorry you had to deal with this. i think we can clear this mess by giving the videotape to sebastian, but then ofcourse there is Quickscammer might say its just video i as you self shot and thats it.

i suggest we could just post the tracking number on public and let Quickscammer take his accusations and shove it up his you know where...

any possible solutions you have, be my guest.