Quote from: altcoinUK on January 29, 2016, 02:31:32 PM

Stock market trading is not for people without money. Please note I am not saying you are the usual high school or university age youngster of the forum nor I am saying you don't have money ... all I am saying is if $750.00 per annum is "too much of my money" for an investment service then I think you fundamentally misunderstand the environment in which Armstrong operates.

He may not understand it but do you? You didnt do your fact-checking and all you do here is just copying MAs sales pitch and spread it all over the forum. I.e. you work for him. Which means you got fucked twice: first by swallowing MAs bs and second by working for him for free. Its called double penetration. And funny part is that you dont even realize it. Despite all the facts brought and explained to you by many on this forum and elsewhere.

Quote

Many of his clients - including government and the world's largest banks - have been with him for 30 years, and - even it is his nature and habit to hype his service and promote himself like a second hand car salesman does - his clients understand very well what he is selling.

Now we are really getting embarrassed for you. Do you at least realize how you sound when you reproduce such charlatanic bs without applying even 1% of common sense? What do you know about his clients and what could you possibly know? Do you have any evidence to support any of your claims? Neither governments nor worlds largest banks are MAs clients. They cannot be his clients nor will they ever be. MA is an uneducated convicted fraudster and con artist who lost hundreds of millions and cheated Japanese investors. Any official entity especially governments cannot deal with convicted criminals even if they wanted to. They have policies, approval committees, security and background checks, etc to filter providers, counterparties, and all. How stupid is it to even think they could even remotely be in any relation with people like MA? It is possible of course that some junior analysts or alike at investment banks are MAs clients. But as individuals, not as representatives of organizations let alone governments.

Can you name at least one client that has been with MA for 30 years? How do you know whether clients understand what and how well? We have evidence right here on this forum that at least some of them dont understand anything at all.

Quote from: altcoinUK on January 29, 2016, 03:01:57 PM

The reason of that, because he is not fucking Isaac Newton was sitting under an apple tree, and then a fucking apple fell on his head to allow him concluding the Universal Law of Gravitation i.e. he is not dealing with empirical science like physics is, but he is dealing with all variables of the stock market dynamics including but not limited to earning reports, non farm payroll statistics, politics, corporate interests, central bank interventions, wars, scams, market manipulation, innovations, lies from the Chinese government about GDP figures, natural disasters and last but not least the often unpredictable crowd behaviour.

You should really start learning how to read, otherwise its going to get even worse. All you mentioned is exactly what MA claims. He claims that he is dealing with empirical science like physics. Thats why he always brings a lot of bs on Mandelbrot set and other stuff everywhere regardless of any relevance. He claims that markets are not random walk and everything not only can be predicted but is predicted by him and\or his computer (which nobody has ever seen). He also claims that all those variables are just noise, market manipulations dont exist\or dont affect markets, natural disasters go in cycles and therefore can be predicted and are predicted by him and so on. Thats precisely what he is selling: the claim that markets can be predicted like physics and is predicted by him and only by him\his computer.