Quote from: sloanf on January 29, 2016, 07:07:03 PM

Quote from: altcoinUK on January 29, 2016, 06:34:27 PM

As much as as you can know about them when you sit next to them as well as networking with them during an Armstrong's conference.

Now it's getting more interesting. So you attend his conferences for several thousands, would you let us know then if there was anything new or useful for you? Did you make any use of knowledge you allegedly acquired in terms of profit\loss? Have you met any government or world's largest banks there?

Quote

I suggest to get out from your troll cave and attend his next conference. You will meet me there (yes, some retail traders like me attend his conference), which will provide you a wonderful opportunity to apologize in person for your personal insults, and most importantly you will meet some of his serious clients there.

You yet again prove that you work for MA by selling me his conferences. Don't you still realize that you are used not just once but twice? But that aside, name me his serious clients (apart from yourself, of course) and who are those clients that are with him for 30 years?

Quote

In the meantime until you save up your high school lunch money for the conference you need to fuck off from here son. Your personal insults and trolling is not cool. You feel it is important to reiterate your wisdom about Armstrong and to tell us how stupid we are here that we find more or less value in Armstrong's work, which is a sick fuck troll attitude. Open the "I am so smart and have proof that anybody who find value in Armstrong's work is stupid" thread and discuss there why Armstrong is a useless analyst. This is the thread where we are more or less positive about Armstrong's work. You made it clear that in your opinion there is no value in Armstrong's work. Therefore, your work is done here - reiterating your opinion is patronizing in a thread which purpose is to take the positives from Armstrong's work.

The purpose of this thread is as it states in the very first message "views on his ideas" on MA. And I am the one who provides not just views or opinions but facts citing sources and all. I provide relevant content for this thread, so my participation here is relevant and useful. If you disagree, bring facts with sources so everybody could look into them and update their views on MA.

Mmm, hmm. Yes, even though I look rather favorably on Armstrong's ideas (even where I disagree, at least somewhat [gold]), it is discussion of his IDEAS which is what I hoped to get (and still do) that is important. Certainly we all need to see comments positive and negative on Armstrong, whose record, at least for me, is still unproven. Very interesting, but unproven.

I don't mind a good & rancorous discussion, in fact I welcome it. Not ad-hominems, but anyone who can argue with some evidence (or contrary ideas, even better if backed-up) is welcome to toss them into this little arena.

If Armstrong's ideas (and comments thereof) get to be too much for one thread, yeah, OK, open another thread to poo-poo them...

Until then, I will read his blog, and while I will not likely take his blog posts as sufficient to INVEST my money, I read them with interest. I also want to read "the good, the bad and the ugly" re Armstrong.