Quote from: Carlton Banks on January 30, 2016, 02:11:52 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on January 30, 2016, 02:06:43 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on January 30, 2016, 01:13:51 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on January 30, 2016, 12:44:28 PM

I am fine with no blocksize limit at all. Let the miners sort it out.

and with slithering your way out of questions you don't like answering. Not much change there either.

Which question do you feel I didn't answer?

It was the part where you conveniently forgot about your support for previous failed dev-team coups, then just said some bland catch-all ("I support Bitcoin with unlimited blocks") when presented with the evidence? Remember that, it happened about 20 minutes ago. On this thread. Roll Eyes

Whatever you say Carlton.

The question CYIAM asked was about whether I had "XT" on my profile and I answered truthfully that I did not.
I assume you're NOT too stupid to understand the difference between BitcoinXT and Bip101, nor are
you too stupid to understand that both Bip101 and unlimited blocks both involve lifting/raising
the current blocksize limit.

I've stated my position many times that I think we need bigger blocks and
I'm unsatisfied with Core's leadership, communication, and decisions on that
particular aspect of Bitcoin. No big secret there.

If your point is that I supported blocksize increase proposals in the past that have failed,
then yep, you're right. That is 100% true.

But the "slithering" accusations are nothing but trolling, politicking nonsense.