Quote from: mikewirth on February 01, 2016, 01:01:13 PM

Quote from: keepdoing on February 01, 2016, 12:48:24 PM

Quote from: Lauda on February 01, 2016, 12:31:06 PM

You're not even trying anymore which makes me wonder if you've become desperate? You're just working against Core and in favor of Classic. Usually most of the stuff that you've written is false.

Lauda, you are such a lying, misdirecting shill. I am hardly desperate.... I moved most of my bitcoins into Ethereum. I'm up 30%. If you and the rest of the idiots sitting around in denial about Core's demise continue to make it clear you are willing to kill Bitcoin if you can't have your way.... then I'll move the rest of my coins into Ethereum. And I WILL make money. Now, after you guys are gone, and Classic Devs back in charge.... I will come back into bitcoin.

But the FUD, misdirection, lies, and sabotage that is being played by Core/Blockstream supporters is getting dangerous, and I thnk this Fork may turn out very badly for people not careful. What bothers me is that while MOST people may not step on any financial disater mines during hte Fork..... I think Core Supporters will stop at nothing, including spreading lies that may drive some hapless uninformed people to exchange coins that render them useless on the Core chain.

Innocents will lose money.... because of people like you.

Core/Blockstream is crazy to think bitcoiners are just going to sit around while they bend the direction of the network into their own little private project. No way. Bitcoiners do not like privatization.

Core devs are conflicted. It is a conflict of interest that they impose a 1MB blocksize which clearly serves no purpose other than to drive need for their bullshit sidechain solutions which are going to generate money for their company.

Core = Blockstream. We need Classic today and 8MB blocks to render Core/Blockstream irrelevant. How did Maxwell get so much power to stop the masses anyway? This 'Veto' power is dangerous.

Yeah, let's make the blockchain grow 8 times faster guaranteeing people can't run nodes and the process of node centralization starts and we end up with both centralized nodes and centralizing mining.

Let's also "make irrelevant" Blockstream which is the only way to scale Bitcoin to global levels without the massive centralization that raising the blocksize to retarded/Toomin/XT levels would bring us to.

You have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about. Please go study a bit and then come back with some sound arguments.

Why is Gmaxwell so relevant? Maybe because he is one of the top contributors to Bitcoin and has done more useful things than you'll ever do in your life.

By the way, Gmaxwell has been defending his same arguments way before Blockstream was founded, so your tinfoil-hat type of arguments about the company are laughable.