Quote from: FruitsBasket on February 01, 2016, 08:03:30 PM

Then I think you are a lucky moderator because others have said that they get many reports.

It doesn't work like that. All patrollers see the same reports (if you exclude specific sections that they moderate, but we are not talking about the rank moderator).

Quote from: mexxer-2 on February 01, 2016, 07:55:38 PM

Staff given the ability to have a separate "trust" system, that should be a visible enough to let the campaign managers/runners know that they shouldn't accept the "person"/account. Or another system might be, an implementation of "DefaultIgnoreList" where if enough staff members think a participant shouldn't be running around with a signature, they can place them on the ignore list of everyone, with the option of members being able to manually remove them(which ofc only a few do even with DefaultTrust)

I don't think that theymos would implement another type of system though. However it would be nice if staff members could vote on specific members and once a certain threshold is reached their signature would automatically get removed (decentralized moderation anyone?). I don't think 'placing on the ignore list of everyone' is a good idea at all, rather a bad one.

Quote from: mexxer-2 on February 01, 2016, 08:05:54 PM

Humans do a thing called bragging , just FYI

You mean the 'others'? I'd be glad to take on their reports though. As I've previously stated, there are more than enough staff members, but there could be an imbalance in the workload.