Quote from: afbitcoins on February 03, 2016, 10:36:08 PM

Quote from: spatula on February 03, 2016, 10:21:27 PM

Quote from: afbitcoins on February 03, 2016, 10:13:27 PM

Quote from: DaveJones on February 03, 2016, 09:55:30 PM

Quote from: eduffield on February 03, 2016, 08:49:26 PM

snip

I finally changed my votes to "No" due to the crazy flip-flopping the network was doing. Plus Otoh had changed his votes from "No" to "Yes" just this morning, due to hearing it was working out with Terpin. I asked him to change them back to "No" so we could implement a proper contract. I think it makes much more sense.

That doesn't read like: The network of master nodes decide Roll Eyes

Hmm true dat. Seems like a few people control a lot of masternodes. A majority? Motion that 'vote many' is abolished ?

Are you saying if I have more than one masternode, that means I shouldn't get more than one vote? Or perhaps it should just be more difficult for me to vote my nodes than someone with one?

I don't know how you could stop someone having more than one vote but you can at least make it difficult for someone to vote hundreds (or more) times. But how would that get voted in ? lol

Maybe safe to assume that the dictator(s) still have ultimate power

Why would you want to make it more difficult for people who have invested a lot of money in Dash to vote? I don't see the benefit.

"dictators"? Because some people have a larger investment than others, therefore get proportionally more votes does not make them "dictators". It means they have more to gain/lose at the same proportion level as anyone else by investment.