Quote from: smooth on February 03, 2016, 11:10:14 PM

Quote from: afbitcoins on February 03, 2016, 10:27:28 PM

Quote from: LucyLovesCrypto on January 27, 2016, 09:56:12 PM

Quote from: afbitcoins on January 27, 2016, 08:19:30 PM

Also I remember hearing about an anonymisation technique in which you have to trust the person who generated the first block to destroy the private key without writing it down, otherwise they have the ability to decrypt the anonymisation forever after. Is this using that technique ? If so why trust they don't have the backdoor key handy ?

Your memory is only partially right. There is a potential problem with trusted setup. They have said they play to do this in some public ceremony with multiple parties so that unless ALL of those parties collude, the minting process is safe.

If all parties colluded they could print a unlimited number of coins undetected, however the privacy of transactions would not be affected. Essentially it is an economic threat of a poorly designed setup allowing parties to collude to print unlimited coins. There is not a privacy threat from collusion.

Good god that is like a million times worse. So they'd be able to 'print' unlimited quantity of money undetected ? And we trust that this inner circle present at the seeding ceremony are trustworthy !

Shocked

We don't know how the participants will be chosen, so perhaps best to wait and see before reaching conclusions.

They are using multi party computation, which is a transparent way to generate the starting seed. See my post up-thread.... there will be no "ceremony".