Quote from: Lauda on February 04, 2016, 09:50:39 PM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 04, 2016, 09:48:07 PM

Do you realize you quoted this: Schildbach shared the concerns as presented by Bitcoin Classic, and believes a hard fork to be the preferred solution.
Blocks are full, and I dont agree that a hard fork solution would be short notice. Weve been discussing this issue for years now! I would prefer we roll out a hard fork, he said.

Yes; however that's not why I quoted the article and is a straw-man if used as an argument. He never mentions anything about the problematic consensus threshold, but I don't want to discuss this again.

Quote

That said, I can live with a soft fork, too. And I hope one day a hard fork will be used to clean up the soft-forking mess we leave behind.

Eventually we must/should do a HF.

If the fullblocalyse isn't reason enough, what will be?