Quote from: franky1 on February 04, 2016, 09:53:21 PM

i said PROCESSING TIME..

I never talked about processing time, I was always talking about validation time and thus your idiocy is astounding. Clever move though, I didn't even read that one properly. So even the assumption is wrong.

Quote from: franky1 on February 04, 2016, 09:53:21 PM

by the way your allegience to blockstream is too obvious. yet i have not shown an allegience to gavin coin or toomin coin or blockstream. my personal opinion is purely on a clean coded implementation of 2mb blocks, without any corporate backers running the show. and without any crappy roadmaps that divert users away from bitcoin.. that goes for all 3 shellgames.. r3, toomin and blockstream

You obviously have some problems as I have stated otherwise multiple times (I don't support a contentious HF regardless of who's behind it). Yeah and Classic isn't run by the brothers that are trying hard to push their product Consider.it. Roll Eyes

You've changed stances pretty quickly like a few other individuals which makes it pretty obvious that there is "no allegiance". Enough of this, I'm putting you back on ignore list, that's where you belong after so much ad hominem.

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on February 04, 2016, 09:54:40 PM

If the fullblocalyse isn't reason enough, what will be?

Once it is safe to deploy a increase of the block size (between 2-4 MB I'd say). This HF now does not do anything necessary besides a block size increase. If we're going to do one, then we might as well include other changes (if needed). Obviously this is just my opinion, I can't tell you when this is going to happen as I have no idea.

Quote from: youhgt2 on February 04, 2016, 09:56:12 PM

Where can I find more info about this proposal?

BIP.